Synthetic Exposure Without Mandate Breach

When return opportunities exist, but the mandate blocks access.


Sector: Asset Manager – Institutional / Superannuation
Asset Class: Defensive Portfolio – Synthetic Fixed Income Exposure
Situation Type: Mandate-constrained portfolio unable to access offshore carry despite economic conviction
Primary Issue: Structural return drag driven by legal form, classification rules, and governance survivability – not risk appetite


The Situation

A large institutional defensive portfolio identified persistent return underperformance versus offshore peers.

The investment team had high conviction in emerging-market local-currency debt economics – carry, diversification, and duration fit were well understood.

On paper, the opportunity was attractive. In practice, the mandate architecture blocked access.

The issue was not risk tolerance. It was whether exposure could be implemented without reopening the trust deed, breaching defensive classification, or creating trustee and audit fragility.


Why This Scenario Is Common

  • Defensive mandates are drafted conservatively and rarely revisited

  • Derivatives are often permitted only for risk reduction, not exposure creation

  • Governance prioritises form and classification over economic equivalence

  • One-off exceptions pass IC but fail long-term survivability

  • Structural return drag accumulates quietly without triggering alarms

This is governance inertia, not investment error.


Why It Matters

When economically valid exposures are blocked by form:

  • Defensive portfolios under-earn for non-risk reasons

  • Carry differentials compound annually

  • Peers capture return while optics remain unchanged

  • Investment teams lose optionality without breaching rules

  • Inaction becomes the most expensive choice

Nothing “breaks”. Performance just leaks.


How This Is Typically Addressed

  • Accepting mandate limitations as immutable

  • Deferring action pending policy or deed review

  • Implementing technically compliant but fragile structures

  • Using unfunded derivatives that fail audit scrutiny

  • Relying on narrative explanations rather than a durable form

These approaches preserve comfort, not outcomes.


Primary Engagement Route

Primary Offer: Structuring-as-a-Service™
Governance-safe synthetic exposure design – preserving defensive classification while restoring economic access.

Read the IC Brief (2-page decision summary)

Full structural narrative shared selectively on request.

Illustrative scenario for discussion purposes only. Not a transaction summary or client-specific case study.

Want to go deeper?

Let’s explore how derivatives, structuring, and hedging choices are impacting your portfolio and where drag is quietly creeping in.